not advocating sin

I need to put one thing to rest. I am not advocating sin. This seems to be everyone’s chief fear when I talk to them. Pastors, friends, close people, people who see my imperfections and ridicule the message of grace, actually almost everyone I know, disputes the message because they think I am advocating sin, or what is called in theological circles “antinomianism.” I can’t even seem to finish a sentence before I am interrupted and corrected and rebuked for this. In fact I am pressing on with this work despite the fact that I am terribly discouraged right now because the obvious and wonderful message here is so universally opposed because of this fear.

Let’s look at the way Paul approaches this. In Romans, Paul spends 11 chapters setting the stage, in which there are very few if any direct imperatives. Go thumb through Romans 1-11 some time and check it out – very few imperatives. He spends 11 chapters describing what it means to NOT be a believer, what it means to BE one, and the Christian’s place in the dealings of God with the Jewish nation. He explains grace for 11 chapters! In chapter 12, when he begins to press into practical the practical applications of this identity, he starts by saying:

“I urge you THEREFORE, brethren, BY THE MERCIES OF GOD, to present your bodies a living and holy sacrifice, acceptable to God, which is your spiritual service fo worship.” (Romans 12:1, NASB)

We are so worried about not being antinomian that we just like to skip all that drivel about our identity in Christ, about being identified with His death, all of that stuff that is so hard to understand, and jump straight to the good stuff, the convicting part, the application. We like to hear the convicting stuff. Yet, look how strange his list of applications are:

– think humbly of yourself
– exercise your gifts humbly, such as:
— prophecy, service, exhortation, giving, leading, mercy
– unhypocritical love
– love good and abhor evil
– brotherly love and honor
– etc.

It never really gets to any seriously convicting part, I guess Paul didn’t enjoy trying to make people feel guilty and terrible about themselves. In fact once he gets through this list, he launches into an entire section about being in subjection to the governing authorities, which at the time were actively anti-Christian.

What exactly am I saying? I am saying that real belief in grace, real belief in “the mercies of God”, is the kind of belief that inevitably raises the question “what – should we just sin more? There are no rules at all???” (Rom 6:1) If you aren’t getting that question then you probably aren’t advocating as strong a message of grace as THE BIBLE is! Do sinners like to hang out with you? Then you probably aren’t in the right camp. And it is just this message of dangerous levels of grace, outrageous levels of mercy, total and sustained forgiveness, that is the real soil for genuine holiness.

We see the same pattern in the other letters of Paul. For example, in Ephesians, He spends 3 chapters without any imperative at all, just going on about Christ and our identity in Him as a believer. Starting in chapter 4, he says

“walk in a manner worthy of the calling with which you have been called.” In other words, get it straight that you are the beloved of God, called by grace, given tremendous gifts by grace, and walk practically in the light of that. But we want to jump straight to Eph 5 and beat married people over the head with loving and serving the spouse. Guess what? None of it makes any sense until you get the first 3 chapters straight!

Ministers with lots of theological brainwashing inevitably try to couch everything in terms of its danger for antinomianism or arminianism or 5 point Calvinism or some other theological mumbo-jumbo, instead of reading the ACTUAL TEXT of scripture for what it obviously really says. I am tired of all the guilt-inducing thinly veiled pseudo-grace double-speak. I believe in a God who truly loves me, in fact who likes me quite a bit. I am going to live from that place, and everyone who feels compelled to dispute it can try that if it makes them happy. I stand today in need of mercy, and I’m getting it!

Posted in Scandalous Grace and tagged , .


  1. While reading your post it dawned on me again the improper view most seem to have been taught regarding the "Law". Our culture views "Law" as codes related to some form of punishment for disobedience. Torah can be translated in that way but also is correctly translated as direction and instruction. Sin is missing the mark, "misdirected" or off target.There are 613 laws (mitzvot) in Torah consisting of 248 positive commands and 365 negative ones. As I am sure you know there are 3 types of law in the bible; civil, ceremonial and moral. Civil laws only apply in Israel as a nation. The ceremonial laws (despite popular teaching) were perpetual covenants to be CELEBRATED (enjoyed, partied, danced, ect..) for all generations. The moral laws are instructions for day to day life. The "Law" (Torah) is the road map. It keeps us pointed in the right direction. Grace applies when we miss the mark or are misdirected. If the "Law" is canceled then we no longer have a direction so Grace looses its meaning. Following that idea to its natural conclusion would mean that all roads would lead to God and anarchy ensues. :-Pjust some random thoughts…Robert

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *